Changes

 &nbsp;::Silicon.SToRM&nbsp;is the project name of the SymbiFace III&nbsp;prototype boards. The informations regarding that name in this article are substantially wrong, as the<br>&nbsp;SF3 / Silicon.SToRM provides neither a RAM-Extension, a ROM-Extension nor something else, that is allready provided by the SF2.<br>&nbsp;::Informations about that prototype should be considered absolutly confidential until i release them myself to the public. to just avoid such missinformations&nbsp;! <br>&nbsp;Unfortunatly i talked to TFM&nbsp;about my current work. Not a good idea as it shows. Thank you much TFM!&nbsp; -&nbsp; I reverted the article to the previous state.&nbsp; [[Dr.Zed|Dr.Zed]]  <br><br> <br> <br> <br>  :::@Dr. Zed: Sorry dass ich das Wort verwendet habe, hatte eben gerade Zeit und wollte die Seite auf dem aktuellen Stand halten. Ich habe ja sonnst nichts kommentiert. No informations have been provided here at all, nothing bad has happened.  <br>  :::@Prodatron: "We have to revert" - ja Euer Majestät! Your luck that it is far under my level to treat the SymbOS article like you try to treat the FutureOS article. It was an error to support you with my Floppy Disc routines for SymbOS,&nbsp;just to see you&nbsp;-&nbsp;my friend - falling me in my back again and again.&nbsp;[[TFM|TFM]]  ::::What kind of reaction is this?? We just wanted to know, what mystical hardware this is. And if it wouldn't exist, there is of course no place for it in the CPC-Wiki. That was everything I wrote, nothing else!?! Crazy reaction... ::::Anyway as we see, you added again a hardware in your blowed-up 'support' list, which you don't support. You even didnt know about the features of the SYMBiFACE III at all (a lot of people already know&nbsp;:-D) and there are no specification available yet, but - of course as usual! - your Fos supports all of it... Wow! Why are you always doing this again and again? What kind of behaviour is this? ::::Oh yes: Your FDC routines (which I don't use btw): Hello?? Did you forget that I also gave you my IDE routines at the same time? That was 2004. Oh man, that's so long ago! You wrote it in all the different lists all the time during all these years, but there is still no FAT file system support available for the public in Fos (ok, maybe in your mystical secret lab) Please note: One of your problems is to post too much hoax. At one point people start stopping believing you at all... [[User:Prodatron|Prodatron]] <br> :::::- Dear Prodatron, maybe you don't have recognized it. But you behave here like the original owner of the CPCWiki. You impute that something is not existing only because YOU don't know it. Do you know all in this world?  <br> :::::- If you would ask like every&nbsp;other person&nbsp;would do... but you issue an ultimatum! Are you the owner of the CPCWiki?  <br> :::::- About your enduring polemics.... I&nbsp;think really nobody here is willing to read again and again your polemics agains my person or FutureOS. Now I&nbsp;think that FutureOS is much better than I&nbsp;ever thought, only by knowing that you try to fight it in that unfair way.  <br> :::::- FDC routines: Guess you are right, if you would use them correct, then SOS would be faster. Your error. At least my routines were teaching you how to program the FDC. I can proove this with one of your Emails.<br> :::::- Your IDE routines: Some low level routines yes. I never used them.&nbsp;I&nbsp;have much faster ones (See IDE ROM, free downloadable). Don't forget FutureOS can use the second register set of the Z80,&nbsp;that is not possible under SOS.  <br> :::::- The actual IDE ROM for FutureOS can be downloaded. Right, there is no complete FAT support, who cares? I&nbsp;prefer to make a game at the moment. Thats more fun for me. If you have a problem with this, thats not my problem.  <br> :::::- A hoax? Can you please provide hard facts or do you just want to discredite me? I think people believe me, because I'm a honest man, straight and correct. But your behaviour is still unappropriate! What a pity to see you going down that poor way.  <br> :::::Finally I&nbsp;relly think this discussion is fruitless, lets stop it here. [[TFM|TFM]].  <br> <br>

<br> :Villain, to you happens at the moment the same mistake like to pdt before. Only because&nbsp;YOU don't know it, it doesn't mean that it is not existing.&nbsp;I'm not allowed to say if there is a prototype or not (now try to use your mind...) or about any features. I got strictly confidental informations and to mention the name in the hardware list was too much. To mix up several parts of some thing was indeed my error, but nothing else. Even if you or pdt try to get more informations from me, I'm not allowed to talk. Cheap tricks don't work, provacate somebody else, please not me.  :The other topic... really! Great! Haaahahahahahaha! Thanks for the hint. Hey guys, now you really have done it. Seems that you have activated somebody who is on my side. And I&nbsp;also really&nbsp;DO NOT believe in coincidence! Sometimes the universe is just fair. And the best thing is, I&nbsp;just must not move only one finger. Hahahahahaha! Thank you all for this wonderfull day! [[TFM|TFM]].  <br> 

 <br> :::Ok, no problem, in future all in english. I was not thinking that a little change in this site will force that strong reactions. So I'm happy that some guys have still strong interest at FutureOS&nbsp;;-) However there is enough time. I can wait and if the time is right I will add some updates here. Bye, [[TFM|TFM]].  <br>