Changes
:::::::::: I don't think a BASIC article should be confined to its historical view only. That said, splitting it into several, small articles would not be practical either. Maybe it should stay as it is with a 'commandname_deep' article following those commands that need more explanation? In any case, you're really more than welcome to give a hand... MORE than welcome :) [[User:Gryzor|Gryzor]] 08:13, 3 February 2008 (CET)
:::::::::: I am stil in favor of a seperate article for evere command! Just like on the C64 wiki! :-) [[USR:Ygdrazil|Ygdrazil]]
