Difference between revisions of "Talk:FutureSoft"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | Neither Nilquader or i are members of Futuresoft. So TFM please dont write such crap! Kangaroo | + | Neither Nilquader or i are members of Futuresoft. So TFM please dont write such crap! Kangaroo 23.12.2008<br> |
<br> | <br> | ||
| − | I think it is okay to just remove your names from the members list if you are no members of the group, but also removing informations regarding the group itself isn't that fair, in my oppinion. This was shurly caused by accidently only reverting the article than just editing it. Never mind :) The heading should be restored IMHO. - Dr.Zed 23.12.2008 | + | I think it is okay to just remove your names from the members list if you are no members of the group, but also removing informations regarding the group itself isn't that fair, in my oppinion. This was shurly caused by accidently only reverting the article than just editing it. Never mind :) The heading should be restored IMHO. - Dr.Zed 23.12.2008 |
| + | |||
| + | Hmm i just switched back to the original edit from before adding my (and JRs) name to the member list. If there is any information lost, i am sure - oh yes i am - tfm will do his very best to correct this. So it was not to be "unfair" or what ever. if you want to correct it.. just do it :-) Kanga 23.12.2008 | ||
Revision as of 10:36, 23 December 2008
Neither Nilquader or i are members of Futuresoft. So TFM please dont write such crap! Kangaroo 23.12.2008
I think it is okay to just remove your names from the members list if you are no members of the group, but also removing informations regarding the group itself isn't that fair, in my oppinion. This was shurly caused by accidently only reverting the article than just editing it. Never mind :) The heading should be restored IMHO. - Dr.Zed 23.12.2008
Hmm i just switched back to the original edit from before adding my (and JRs) name to the member list. If there is any information lost, i am sure - oh yes i am - tfm will do his very best to correct this. So it was not to be "unfair" or what ever. if you want to correct it.. just do it :-) Kanga 23.12.2008
