Difference between revisions of "Talk:Locomotive BASIC"
From CPCWiki - THE Amstrad CPC encyclopedia!
m (→Splitting article into smaller pieces) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Well, after I added subcategories (which are necessary in my opinion to jump to a command easily and from other articles) you can see that the whole index blowed up :(. I guess that this was the reason in the C64 wiki to add an article for each command and I fear we will end up like they did, because you then have the possibility to add a category and let the wiki create a alphabetical index. Another point is, that if you want to describe a command more in detail you need the space for a short example routine which will make this article very, very big in the future. --[[User:Octoate|Octoate]] 09:46, 14 September 2006 (CEST) | Well, after I added subcategories (which are necessary in my opinion to jump to a command easily and from other articles) you can see that the whole index blowed up :(. I guess that this was the reason in the C64 wiki to add an article for each command and I fear we will end up like they did, because you then have the possibility to add a category and let the wiki create a alphabetical index. Another point is, that if you want to describe a command more in detail you need the space for a short example routine which will make this article very, very big in the future. --[[User:Octoate|Octoate]] 09:46, 14 September 2006 (CEST) | ||
: Yes, I agree. I must admit, that it makes much more sense to have one article for each command. -- [[User:Prodatron|Prodatron]] 11:39, 14 September 2006 (CEST) | : Yes, I agree. I must admit, that it makes much more sense to have one article for each command. -- [[User:Prodatron|Prodatron]] 11:39, 14 September 2006 (CEST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Well, imagine that... sucks! Then again, nobody prohibits you from collapsing the contents, no? [[User:Gryzor|Gryzor]] 13:16, 14 September 2006 (CEST) | ||
Revision as of 06:16, 14 September 2006
Splitting article into smaller pieces
Well, after I added subcategories (which are necessary in my opinion to jump to a command easily and from other articles) you can see that the whole index blowed up :(. I guess that this was the reason in the C64 wiki to add an article for each command and I fear we will end up like they did, because you then have the possibility to add a category and let the wiki create a alphabetical index. Another point is, that if you want to describe a command more in detail you need the space for a short example routine which will make this article very, very big in the future. --Octoate 09:46, 14 September 2006 (CEST)
- Yes, I agree. I must admit, that it makes much more sense to have one article for each command. -- Prodatron 11:39, 14 September 2006 (CEST)
- Well, imagine that... sucks! Then again, nobody prohibits you from collapsing the contents, no? Gryzor 13:16, 14 September 2006 (CEST)
