Difference between revisions of "MediaWiki talk:Sidebar"

From CPCWiki - THE Amstrad CPC encyclopedia!
Jump to: navigation, search
(Suggested changes)
m (Rollback)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
 
:I explained that in the Main page Discussion... It's temporary, but it has a point. Besides, and I have to stress this, the "In Short" article is, indeed, '''short'''. If that's the only thing that can be written about the cpc series hardware, and seing as it took me maybe less than an hour to write, then it's sad, sad, sad... [[User:Gryzor|Gryzor]] 07:16, 12 August 2006 (CEST)
 
:I explained that in the Main page Discussion... It's temporary, but it has a point. Besides, and I have to stress this, the "In Short" article is, indeed, '''short'''. If that's the only thing that can be written about the cpc series hardware, and seing as it took me maybe less than an hour to write, then it's sad, sad, sad... [[User:Gryzor|Gryzor]] 07:16, 12 August 2006 (CEST)
 
:: Well, I would also group the three old generation CPC into one article. Of course this Wiki is about the CPC, but it's still a waste of space for having a direct link to each single CPC model. -- [[User:Prodatron|Prodatron]] 14:30, 12 August 2006 (CEST)
 
:: Well, I would also group the three old generation CPC into one article. Of course this Wiki is about the CPC, but it's still a waste of space for having a direct link to each single CPC model. -- [[User:Prodatron|Prodatron]] 14:30, 12 August 2006 (CEST)
 +
:::The sidebar looks much better now. But do we really need two search windows? ;-) --[[User:Villain|Villain]] 18:08, 15 August 2006 (CEST)
  
 
== Suggested changes ==
 
== Suggested changes ==
Line 23: Line 24:
 
**Parties and Events
 
**Parties and Events
 
**Magazines/Fanzines
 
**Magazines/Fanzines
 +
 +
== Rollback ==
 +
 +
Hi, I don't know, if you made a mistake with the rollback, but I think the current one is more logical (see "software", "scene", "present"...). PD libraries doesn't belong to the scene but to software, and in the "present" section "news" should be mentioned (they include upcoming events) instead of the deleted calendar. -- [[User:Prodatron|Prodatron]] 16:08, 29 August 2006 (CEST)
 +
:Yup, looks better now :) [[User:Gryzor|Gryzor]] 09:39, 30 August 2006 (CEST)

Latest revision as of 02:39, 30 August 2006

Hi Gryzor.. Why the heck do you re-add th ewhole bunch of CPC-Models on the side-bar, if it can be sumarized (and IS summarized) in the "in Short" Article? Just rename the "in SHort" in "The CPC-Models" and you have a LOT of space won on the sidebar Kangaroo MusiQue of HJT 22:17, 11 August 2006 (CEST)

I explained that in the Main page Discussion... It's temporary, but it has a point. Besides, and I have to stress this, the "In Short" article is, indeed, short. If that's the only thing that can be written about the cpc series hardware, and seing as it took me maybe less than an hour to write, then it's sad, sad, sad... Gryzor 07:16, 12 August 2006 (CEST)
Well, I would also group the three old generation CPC into one article. Of course this Wiki is about the CPC, but it's still a waste of space for having a direct link to each single CPC model. -- Prodatron 14:30, 12 August 2006 (CEST)
The sidebar looks much better now. But do we really need two search windows? ;-) --Villain 18:08, 15 August 2006 (CEST)

Suggested changes

  • Contents - ok
  • Hardware
    • In short
    • CPC 464/664/6128
    • etc...
  • Software
    • The games
    • Serious software
    • PD libraries
    • Programming
  • The present
    • News and projects
    • Emulators
    • Links
  • The scene
    • Groups and members
    • Parties and Events
    • Magazines/Fanzines

Rollback

Hi, I don't know, if you made a mistake with the rollback, but I think the current one is more logical (see "software", "scene", "present"...). PD libraries doesn't belong to the scene but to software, and in the "present" section "news" should be mentioned (they include upcoming events) instead of the deleted calendar. -- Prodatron 16:08, 29 August 2006 (CEST)

Yup, looks better now :) Gryzor 09:39, 30 August 2006 (CEST)