Difference between revisions of "Amstrad Commercials"
(New page: {{#ev:youtube|DE83iQlRi2o|300}} {{#ev:youtube|Mnfs_M5nkEc|300}} {{#ev:youtube|x2NG7vnon7k|300}}) |
m (→CPC related) |
||
| (12 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | == Amstrad CPC related TV commercials. == | ||
{{#ev:youtube|DE83iQlRi2o|300}} | {{#ev:youtube|DE83iQlRi2o|300}} | ||
| Line 5: | Line 6: | ||
{{#ev:youtube|x2NG7vnon7k|300}} | {{#ev:youtube|x2NG7vnon7k|300}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ==Amstrad CPC french Ads== | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{#ev:youtube|eJUAzhiLh-k|300}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{#ev:youtube|fu9Bmlk67Dk|300}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ==Amstrad PLUS and GX4000 French Ads (Crocodiles inside)== | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{#ev:youtube|HKghiDIljrw|300}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{#ev:youtube|-LdBZSztB8A|300}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{#ev:youtube|SHHvYPQNbY4|300}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{#ev:youtube|XotpJVK80ck|300}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{#ev:youtube|me94VyUSclw|300}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ==Amstrad PC1512 French Ads== | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{#ev:youtube|dIH63w1BjsQ|300}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{#ev:youtube|X7o-BoXXu70|300}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{#ev:youtube|8wzBi7YVt90|300}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Amstrad PCs Australian Ads== | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{#ev:youtube|84dzQK0cnAE|300}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | (Where are the crocodiles ???) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | == CPC related == | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | {{#ev:youtube|Zo7jnQXvtNo|300}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | It comes as no surprise that the CPC464 lost to the BBC. The BBC was, of course, commissioned and promoted by the BBC, so that the criteria used were biased in favor of the Acorn machine. | ||
| + | |||
| + | For instance, they overplayed the software quantity point; but this would leave any new machine fighting an uphill fight. Also, the graphical capabilities were not protrayed accurately, maybe because they were not fully understood. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | {{#ev:youtube|xPNwD-KVAVU|300}} | ||
| + | {{#ev:youtube|Nt1UJrzPmyc|300}} | ||
| + | {{#ev:youtube|41ZORB3sxJ4|300}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | German videos featuring a Schneider CPC.... | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Category:CPC History]][[Category:Video contents| ]] | ||
Latest revision as of 02:30, 28 March 2010
Contents
{{#ev:youtube|DE83iQlRi2o|300}}
{{#ev:youtube|Mnfs_M5nkEc|300}}
{{#ev:youtube|x2NG7vnon7k|300}}
Amstrad CPC french Ads
{{#ev:youtube|eJUAzhiLh-k|300}}
{{#ev:youtube|fu9Bmlk67Dk|300}}
Amstrad PLUS and GX4000 French Ads (Crocodiles inside)
{{#ev:youtube|HKghiDIljrw|300}}
{{#ev:youtube|-LdBZSztB8A|300}}
{{#ev:youtube|SHHvYPQNbY4|300}}
{{#ev:youtube|XotpJVK80ck|300}}
{{#ev:youtube|me94VyUSclw|300}}
Amstrad PC1512 French Ads
{{#ev:youtube|dIH63w1BjsQ|300}}
{{#ev:youtube|X7o-BoXXu70|300}}
{{#ev:youtube|8wzBi7YVt90|300}}
Amstrad PCs Australian Ads
{{#ev:youtube|84dzQK0cnAE|300}}
(Where are the crocodiles ???)
{{#ev:youtube|Zo7jnQXvtNo|300}}
It comes as no surprise that the CPC464 lost to the BBC. The BBC was, of course, commissioned and promoted by the BBC, so that the criteria used were biased in favor of the Acorn machine.
For instance, they overplayed the software quantity point; but this would leave any new machine fighting an uphill fight. Also, the graphical capabilities were not protrayed accurately, maybe because they were not fully understood.
{{#ev:youtube|xPNwD-KVAVU|300}}
{{#ev:youtube|Nt1UJrzPmyc|300}}
{{#ev:youtube|41ZORB3sxJ4|300}}
German videos featuring a Schneider CPC....
