Difference between revisions of "Talk:FutureOS"
From CPCWiki - THE Amstrad CPC encyclopedia!
(What's about respecting some rules?) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
And can i really add any device and it will be recommended by the system without any device driver? | And can i really add any device and it will be recommended by the system without any device driver? | ||
Unbelievable!! and much better than SymbOS then, isn't it? | Unbelievable!! and much better than SymbOS then, isn't it? | ||
| + | |||
| + | == What's about respecting some rules? == | ||
| + | |||
| + | As this is not Wikipedia but our own scene CPCWiki, I wouldn't like to force the articles to follow strict rules, but at least the following two rules should be respected by everyone: | ||
| + | * no advertisment-like phrases | ||
| + | * no false information | ||
| + | |||
| + | The following parts in this article should be removed and replaced in a section like "possible plans for the future": | ||
| + | * IDE support (mentioned several times, and first I mixed v8 with v9, but as it should only be a possible part of v9 [and now even v8 isn't released], it will not be implemented before 2007 or later, right?) | ||
| + | * CPC Booster support (you can't call an entry in the port monitor "support") | ||
| + | * Multi tasking (I couldn't find any references) | ||
| + | If I am wrong, and these features are already implemented in FutureOS and ready for download, please provide us a link. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Some other parts should also be removed: | ||
| + | * One-drive restriction of other OSs (nearly every OS can do this, even Amsdos allows drive letters in a path) | ||
| + | * Advertisment-like phrases (e.g. "FutureOS is for programmers who want to use the CPC at its limits" and other ones; these should be better placed on a homepage but not in a Wiki) | ||
| + | -- [[User:Prodatron|Prodatron]] 00:05, 9 August 2006 (CEST) | ||
Revision as of 17:05, 8 August 2006
Hmm.. are there any applications for Future OS? And can i really add any device and it will be recommended by the system without any device driver? Unbelievable!! and much better than SymbOS then, isn't it?
What's about respecting some rules?
As this is not Wikipedia but our own scene CPCWiki, I wouldn't like to force the articles to follow strict rules, but at least the following two rules should be respected by everyone:
- no advertisment-like phrases
- no false information
The following parts in this article should be removed and replaced in a section like "possible plans for the future":
- IDE support (mentioned several times, and first I mixed v8 with v9, but as it should only be a possible part of v9 [and now even v8 isn't released], it will not be implemented before 2007 or later, right?)
- CPC Booster support (you can't call an entry in the port monitor "support")
- Multi tasking (I couldn't find any references)
If I am wrong, and these features are already implemented in FutureOS and ready for download, please provide us a link.
Some other parts should also be removed:
- One-drive restriction of other OSs (nearly every OS can do this, even Amsdos allows drive letters in a path)
- Advertisment-like phrases (e.g. "FutureOS is for programmers who want to use the CPC at its limits" and other ones; these should be better placed on a homepage but not in a Wiki)
-- Prodatron 00:05, 9 August 2006 (CEST)
