Changes

Talk:FutureOS

701 bytes added, 01:08, 13 January 2009
*90% of the needed routines are located in the core ROMs of the FutureOS. <br>*The different text-blocks (in all different languages) part of the single program. Since every single application uses different sentences, this is - no doubt - useful. <br>*Few routines of CBM are part of every single application. Why?&amp;nbsp;It makes all applications more flexible.
However the main part of CBM is located in the core ROMs. It is a part of the OS. We can discuss about a rewrite of the section, but a deletion is just a bad joke. [[TFM|TFM]].<br> <br>
<br>
:It's obvious, that textoutput and keyboard routines are in the Fos rom and not in CBM. This still doesn't make it to a part of Fos. [[User:Prodatron|Prodatron]] 22:20, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
<br> However, there is no reason to DELETE the section. I will rewrite it now. [[TFM|TFM]].
Nobody is talking about textoutput routines. There are specail routines, only used by CBM,&nbsp;And NO, I&nbsp;will not provide the source code of&nbsp;FutureOS to you to proove this.&nbsp;So why can't you understand that&nbsp;CBM is an ESSENTIAL part of the OS? What do you expect from a part of the OS? Must it be in ROM?&nbsp;In this case&nbsp;the disc version of SOS&nbsp;wouldn't be an OS at all.&nbsp;[[TFM|TFM]] <br>However, there is no reason to DELETE the section. I will rewrite it now. [[TFM|TFM]].  :: What's so difficult about this? CBM is like CEUS. It uses of course OS routines, it's an UI-extension for the OS, but it is not part of the OS. [[User:Prodatron|Prodatron]] 22:37, 12 January 2009 (UTC) Ok, if you don't like to see it as a part of the OS, you can see it that way. But that's no justification to delete the section of the article. Can you understand this??? If you like write it in another way, but don't delete it. Is it that hard to understand? Greets, [[TFM|TFM]].
== Open questions ==
2,058
edits