Difference between revisions of "User talk:ZoeRobinson"
From CPCWiki - THE Amstrad CPC encyclopedia!
ZoeRobinson (Talk | contribs) m |
|||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
::::Well, JavaCPC works on OS X too (if you have Java installed of course), so maybe you should try that for screenshots. And of course it's also a very accurate emulator otherwise. --[[User:Morn|Morn]] ([[User talk:Morn|talk]]) 19:29, 24 October 2013 (EEST) | ::::Well, JavaCPC works on OS X too (if you have Java installed of course), so maybe you should try that for screenshots. And of course it's also a very accurate emulator otherwise. --[[User:Morn|Morn]] ([[User talk:Morn|talk]]) 19:29, 24 October 2013 (EEST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | :::::Thanks. I'll give it a look. --[[User:ZoeRobinson|ZoeRobinson]] ([[User talk:ZoeRobinson|talk]]) 19:33, 24 October 2013 (EEST) |
Revision as of 11:33, 24 October 2013
Hi Zoe!
Welcome to CPC-Wiki! Could you reupload the screenshots at Amstrad Action September 1987 Type-Ins without the scanline effect? Those scanlines make the image thumbnails extremely dark and hard to decipher.
Thanks! --Morn (talk) 13:47, 23 October 2013 (EEST)
- The scanlines came up when I took the screenshot. I'll see if I can deinterlace them but I can't guarantee anything. --ZoeRobinson (talk) 14:06, 23 October 2013 (EEST)
- It's MacCpc, which is pretty good for bashing out type-ins because it's fast and lightweight. It's not so good for making sure they work, however - it doesn't handle RSXes well, plus a few other issues cropped up while I was working on Issue 25; hence that's not going to be a 100% tested update. :( --ZoeRobinson (talk) 20:53, 23 October 2013 (EEST)
- Thanks. I'll give it a look. --ZoeRobinson (talk) 19:33, 24 October 2013 (EEST)