Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Active CPC Game Developpers"
m (added sections) |
Alan Sugar (Talk | contribs) |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
TBH in my opinion this is an article which doesn't help because the definition of "active" isn't clear. What is "active"? Is it somebody who announced a game years ago? Or somebody who is quitely working in his back office? Do you know if somebody isn't active anymore? How long is the active time? Maybe up to five years? This list never ever can be a complete list and I don't know why it should stay in the Wiki. -[[User:Octoate|Octoate]] 22:08, 16 December 2009 (UTC) | TBH in my opinion this is an article which doesn't help because the definition of "active" isn't clear. What is "active"? Is it somebody who announced a game years ago? Or somebody who is quitely working in his back office? Do you know if somebody isn't active anymore? How long is the active time? Maybe up to five years? This list never ever can be a complete list and I don't know why it should stay in the Wiki. -[[User:Octoate|Octoate]] 22:08, 16 December 2009 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | I agree it is unclear what ''active'' actually means! But maybe we could rename the category different, maybe something like "Active developers in the 21 century" :-), well just a thought! --[[User:Alan Sugar|Alan Sugar]] 09:54, 17 December 2009 (UTC) | ||
== Other topics == | == Other topics == |
Revision as of 04:54, 17 December 2009
Deletion discussion
TBH in my opinion this is an article which doesn't help because the definition of "active" isn't clear. What is "active"? Is it somebody who announced a game years ago? Or somebody who is quitely working in his back office? Do you know if somebody isn't active anymore? How long is the active time? Maybe up to five years? This list never ever can be a complete list and I don't know why it should stay in the Wiki. -Octoate 22:08, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
I agree it is unclear what active actually means! But maybe we could rename the category different, maybe something like "Active developers in the 21 century" :-), well just a thought! --Alan Sugar 09:54, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
Other topics
Category name contains a typing mistake. The correct spelling is "Active CPC Game Developers".
Something else: How can somebody say "after the end of the CPC era". I don't think that this era has an end as long as one CPC (or Emu?) is running anywhere in the cosmos. Think you want to keep the focus on people who don't do if for money!?! --TFM 19:54, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
- Yes.. I think TFM is correct, It's hard to say when the CPC era is over... --CPCLER 20:10, 14 October 2009 (UTC)----
- Well, you are right of course.
First I'd like to say sorry for the mis-typing... I'm not english... Is it possible to Edit the Page name ? yet also to find links to this page in wiki to change them Also ? or must we completlly restart another page and erase this one ? and find all missing links then ?
I have to admit I edit this wiki "à la warrior"...lol. But many terms or even Page's name are un-proper...in proper English. Not that I'm not good in english, but, it may depends the number of beers I drank....re-lol.
I don't know that much thing in wikis...And I wish I knew if I could Edit Page's names. Can we or is it more complicated ?
Concerning the CPC Era, I was talking about commercial exploitation indeed.
So After 1995...well...Nothing ?
But of course we are proof that CPC is still alive and well...(well, Wikipedia's english page on "Demo scene" seems to ignore CPC... we should try something there too...)
Yet the goal was to make a difference within mundane CPC members (utilitaries Softwares, Demo only makers or simply Gamers-users...) and Games Makers. Demo are cool, but games are better...Let's put sub-categories in CPC scene members...if possible... no ?
To be honest, Games are more a sign af well-being fir a computer than Demos...Because Demos are "useless" (so a must have...;-)) but games can appeal to more peoples...and last longer too.
But I admit it was a rogue try from my part, any modo can undo this if he wishes so.
(a better wiki tutorial would ease...really...)
On the other Hand, I edited "Mojo twins" into "Mojon twins" on some pages...But the pages seems to need an exact spelling and Typo...
"M" =/= "m" in the search engine or links...also what about plurials ? Not easy for a beginner like me (I suck at coding, really...)
But if I do it by posting in the forum, it is more time consuming and as you can see, I try to do usefull stuffs.well, sort of...
Sincerely. MacDeath 15 oct 2009.
Okay i fixed it...
Yet sub categories should be used more often, honestly...the big work would be on this : to decide what is a full category and what is a sub category.
so if a Modo could delete this page, THX a lot. MacDeath 15 oct 2009...3h00 in france.