[[Category:Wiki]]
= What Links Here Bug =
Below demonstrates that pages that link via ''':Image:Filename''' aren't shown in the '''File links''' section of the corresponding files page.
This is a pretty serious bug, as people may delete such files, believing that they aren't used.
* [[:Image:ACU8612001.jpg]] - link to ":Image:Filename" - does '''still not''' work ('''not''' shown at http://cpcwiki.eu/index.php/File:ACU8612001.jpg)
* [[Media:ACU8612002.jpg]] - link to "Media:Filename" - works (shown at http://cpcwiki.eu/index.php/File:ACU8612002.jpg)
That is, correct would be the page "Image Bug" being shown in the "File links" section of both jpg's. It is however shown only in the "File links" section of the second jpg.
= GIF Bug =
Test page showing the GIF bug in cpcwiki. If it is a bug... or is it a subtle anti-compuserve campaign...?
[[File:NoPicture.gif|100px|left]]
* '''GIF 100px''' - black colors are lost during resampling
* With Opera: Black Interestingly, black is completely invisble displayed as TRANSPARENT color (=whiteshowing the webpage's background color; which depends on the cpcwiki style used)* With FirefoxSee http: Black is very-very pale (//cpcwiki.eu/index.php?title=almost Image_Bug&useskin=monobook (white background)* See http:/ bright gray/cpcwiki.eu/index.php?title=Image_Bug&useskin=gumaxv (pale blue background)
<br style="clear:both;">
* '''GIF full'''
<br style="clear:both;">
== wikipedia ==
Another example of the GIF problem. Observe that wikipedia DOES show the same imapge properly (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Columbia_River_Knife_%26_Tool).
<gallery>
File:TestImage1bppOutburst open.gif|old upload
File:TestImage1bppOutburst open new upload.gif|new upload (same file, but now looks worse!)
</gallery>
Sorry about the martial looking example, it was the first file found on wikipedia when searching for "gif schematic" being shown in a gallery.
== history ==
The gif image bug dates back (at least) to 2007, unwanted transparency was reported here http://cpcwiki.eu/forum/index.php/topic,72.msg461.html#msg461 will that ever be fixed?